![]() While the downside to intermissions is that the extra time prevents theaters from cramming more screenings into their day, it also creates more revenue via people like me who spend the first half of a movie listening to a neighbor eat popcorn and regretting not partaking oneself. Movie theaters make around 85 percent of their profit from concessions, and a midway break for people to double up on their frozen Cookie Dough Bites will help the struggling industry. Intermissions are good for the industry, too. ![]() That structured break is expected by the audience. No one complains about intermissions in staged plays and operas, after all. A 10-minute break isn't an interruption when it is literally built into the movie. India's Bollywood films are structured in halves, and are so tightly framed around the assumption of an intermission that when they omit the break, it makes headlines. Meanwhile, mid-movie intervals are alive and well overseas, from Iceland to Turkey to India. ![]() There was one in 2014's The Hateful Eight if you saw it on the " roadshow," although the practice mostly died off in the mainstream with Gandhi in 1982. While stateside audiences were once encouraged to stretch their legs at the midway point of gargantuan epics like Gone with the Wind, Ben-Hur, Lawrence of Arabia, and 2001: A Space Odyssey, it is much rarer to find intermissions in modern movies. Why must we moviegoers suffer so? After all, the solution is simple: If we had movie intermissions in America, I could have had my popcorn, seen one small step for man, and we'd all have gone home happy.Ĭompared to other countries, the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |